© 1998-
© 1998-
Kirstin Blaise Lobato
27 Significant Differences Between Bailey’s Death and Blaise’s Statement Known to the LVMPD at the Time of Her Arrest on July 20, 2001. (updated 11-
13 Significant Differences Between Bailey’s Death and Blaise’s Statement Learned by the LVMPD and the Clark County D.A.’s Office After Blaise’s Arrest On July 20, 2001. (updated 11-
Alibi Timeline Of Blaise’s Continuous Presence In Panaca From July 2 to July 9. (updated 11-
Justice:Denied articles
Justice:Denied Issue 26, Fall 2004
Possibility Of Guilt Replaces Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt
Justice:Denied Issue 34, Fall 2006
Click on what part of the book you want to see
14 Inconsistencies Between Facts of Bailey’s Murder and his Behavior and Blaise
(Not considering the differences between Blaise’s statement and the facts of Bailey’s murder. See Tables 1 and 2 for those differences.)
The Introduction provides a basic overview of the case, and helps to understand the Tables that detail the State’s lack of a case.
Aerial photo of physical landmarks identified by Blaise in her statement.
Aerial photo of physical landmarks near the scene of Duran Bailey’s murder. (updated 11-
Habeas Corpus petition filed on May 5, 2010
Click here to view the 3-
(The petition’s 79 grounds begin on page 14. Click on a highlighted ground or exhibit to go to that ground or exhibit.)
(Caution! This is a 3 megabyte pdf file, so it may take a few seconds to load.)
18-
First-
How could she be convicted when the prosecution is required to prove a defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt? This book explains that in the U.S. today the prosecution’s speculation it is “possible” a person committed a crime is enough for that person to be found guilty and imprisoned for decades.
The entire habeas petition is available in a 792-
Click here to go to webpage with details and order information!
Kirstin Blaise Lobato's Unreasonable Conviction Revised and Updated Third Edition:
Possibility Of Guilt Replaces Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt
By Hans Sherrer
Third Edition Now Available With 57 Pages Of New Information!
Timeline and summary of key events in Blaise’s case. (updated 11-
Hans Sherrer, editor and publisher of Justice Denied created this webpage.
“She placed her belief in the justice system, and she ended up being convicted of a crime that she did not commit.”
United States District Court Judge Gloria Navarro
(Stated when she was Ms. Lobato’s attorney and a
Clark County Deputy Special Public Defender in May 2002.)
Lobato’s Opening Brief To The Nevada Supreme Court
Click here to read or download Kirstin’s Lobato’s 129-
Media persons seeking information about Kirstin Blaise Lobato’s case can contact Justice Denied’s editor and publisher Hans Sherrer at
Now Available Online!
© 1998-
© 1998-
About Justice Denied |
Justice Institute |
Speakers |
Kirstin Blaise Lobato v State of Nevada |
Miriam Moskowitz Trial Transcript |
Woman and Innocence Seminal Conference 2010 |
Larry Swearingen Scheduled For Execution Based On “Seat Of The Pants” Evidence |
Larry Swearingen Expert Affidavits |
Tony Ford |
Mark Jordan |
Mark Kirk |
Juan Rivera |
Christopher Parish |
John Spirko |
Derek Tice |